USAID Allegations Spark Controversy Over Funding Enemies
Allegations against the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) reveal possible funding of enemies like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda, raising concerns over U.S. foreign policy and safety.
It seems shocking that a government entity that has the word "aid" in its acronym would ever be accused of doing dirty tricks and worse against the friends and foes of the U.S., much less be defanged or shut down by Donald Trump. For the world's lefties, this defanging is unthinkable. But now, we're finding out all kinds of skullduggery attributed to our color revolutionistas at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), Victoria Nuland, and Samantha Power and their kindred through the years. Color revolution coups have been their specialty, as seen in Ukraine 2014.
Need a race riot in Africa? No problem; USAID is your go-to riot planner. Want to force out a democratically elected president? Call USAID for an information onslaught guaranteed to get rid of any elected populist. Need conservatives censored? Call USAID.
Relatedly, here's how sinister the Deep State 'Blob' Censorship Operation really is.
You may not have heard this unless you follow the work of former CIA targeter and Defense Department operative Sarah Adams. In her recent interview on the "Shawn Ryan Show" podcast, she tracked the Al-Qaeda operation and operators that Jake Sullivan and Hillary Clinton denied were part of the Benghazi attack and proved it was a preplanned Al-Qaeda terrorist attack.
Adams has also tracked back the funds being sent by the United States government to our enemies—the people we went to war against to settle the score for 9/11.
Catherine reports nearby that USAID dollars support Iran's proxies, Hamas. If that's shocking, then you'll want to sit down for this next revelation: the U.S. State Department and USAID pay millions of dollars per week to the Taliban, the bin Laden family leading the group, and the Haqqani terror network. Remember those guys? Didn't we wage a 20-year-long war to get rid of them?
We left Afghanistan, leaving behind billions of dollars in equipment, the strategically important Bagram Air Base, and all the biometric data of our Afghani supporters who put their lives on the line to help our efforts to combat the Taliban and the terrorists they were hiding from us. So, of course, when Joe Biden, Tony Blinken, and Jake Sullivan had us bug out in disgrace, they left the Taliban a ready-made kill list of our allies.
As Adams calculates, we now pay the Taliban and the above parties between $40-87 million per week, transported on a plane by a bag man who dispenses the payoffs.
I asked Adams on X if USAID money was being used to fund our enemies. Oh, yes, you'd better believe it.
Adams replied, "The money to the Taliban moves through so many channels, but yes, USAID is one of them."
Not only do we do that, but we also fund the costs of running the Taliban "refugee" office. That refugee money actually supports Al-Qaeda training camps.
Well, isn't that special?
We pay our enemies—who are indeed our enemies—millions per week. We share intelligence with them and left our other enemy, China, in the driver's seat in Afghanistan. How does this help the United States? Both the U.S. State Department, USAID, and the Pentagon contributed to this situation.
And even though we're paying them millions per month, Adams claims that Al-Qaeda terrorists, whose training camps we're funding, have obtained visas from Brazil, come up through Panama's Darien Gap, and entered our country for Hamas-like attacks in the U.S. Thanks, Joe Biden.
I know Trump discussed negotiating with the Taliban to exit Afghanistan when he was President #45, but considering that USAID employees attempted to sidestep his foreign policy priorities (and were fired for it), wouldn't it be prudent to assess how much we're funding these terrorists who pose a threat to us?